Game of the Week Posting #3

For discussion pertaining to Chess, Net-Chess, or general interests.
Post Reply
iamachessstudent
Posts: 380
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:35 pm

Game of the Week Posting #3

Post by iamachessstudent » Wed Nov 30, 2011 5:48 pm

b]Welcome to the 3rd installment of this column...

Today, I will go over a famous game by the great Adolph Anderssen, against Kieseritzky; this game is known as "the Immortal Game" ..the game was played in London in 1851. It is a very exciting game, which Anderssen sacrificed with Aplomb his Queen, 2 rooks and a Bishop! We see how mistakes are made and how a really great game is created! Remember, it takes TWO to make a beautiful game, and the mistakes are part of it !
As always, any comments, suggestions good, bad or indifferent are encouraged and read and thought on !

Lets Enjoy!!:

White: Adolph Anderssen
Black:Kieseritsky[/b]

King's Gambit Accepted

1. e4, e5
2. f4 The King's Gambit, a very venerable opening that is also played to day by amateurs and GM's alike It can lead to fireworks very rapidly! 2...ef4 The Gambit Accepted.
3. Bc4, Qh4+ This was a common variation in the 1800's, before better ways were found to defend against the Gambit.
4. Kf1, b5 To get the Bishop sights off the F7 square.
5. Bxb5, Nf6 Developing
6. Nf3, Qh6
[pgn=12]1. e4 e5 2. f4 ef4 3. Bc4 Qh4+ 4. Kf1 b5 5. Bxb5 Nf6 6. Nf3 Qh6 7.d3! Nh5 8. Nh4 Qg5 9. Nf5 c6
10. g4 Nf6 11. Rg1 cxb5 12. h4 Qg6 13. h5 Qg5 14. Qf3 Ng8 15. Bxf4 Qf6 16. Nc3 Bc5?? 17. Nd5? Qxb2
18. Bd6? Bxg1?? 19. e5! Qxa1+ 20. Ke2, Na6 21. Nxg7+ Kd8 22. Qxf6+ Nxf6 23. Be7! ++[/pgn]
7.d3!N
A novelty at the time, this move consolidates the e4 pawn and opens the diagonal for White's Q-Bishop. Curiously enough and of interest is that Nigel Short in 1998 beat none other than Gary Kasparov in this opening! Some this game I give you without annotations, as it is a rare Kasparov defeat! ( 7. Nc3, g5; 8. d4, Bb7; 9. h4, Rg8; 10. Kg1, gxh4; 11. Rxg4, Qg6; 12. Qe2, Nxe4; 13. Rxf4, f5; 14. Nh4, Qg3; 15. Nxe4 and Kasparov resigned!!) 7...Nh5 Black could get equality with 7...Ng4; 8.Nc3, Bb7; 9.h3=
8. Nh4 preparing to go to F5. 8...Qg5-= Black can be slightly better here...
9. Nf5, c6
10. g4 White attacks and doesn't consider 10. Ba4, g6; 11. h4, Qf6 Where Black keeps his slight advantage. 10...Nf6 Attacking the g pawn.
11. Rg1!? A very enterprising move! White sacrifices his K-Bishop for prospects of an attack! 11...cxb5 Black accepts the piece but he could stay equal with 11...h5!? ie. 12. h4, Qg6
13. h5, Qg5
14. Qf3
Stacking up on the F pawn 14...Ng8
15. Bxf4, Qf6 White is better here and way ahead of development, count how many Queen moves Black has made!
16. Nc3 more development 16...Bc5?? A very bad move, which preempts White opening the flood gates of an all out attack on the Black position! 16...Qc6 was better: ie 17. Nd4, Qb6; 18. Ncxb5+=
17. Nd5? White misses a game closer in 17. d4!~ with the continuation of 17...Ne7; 18.dxc5, 0-0; 19.Bd6, Nxf5; 20.Qxf5, Bb7; 21.Qxf6, gxf6; 22.g5, Rc8; 23.gxf6, Kh8 and White has a practically own game. 17...Qxb2
[pgn=34]1. e4 e5 2. f4 ef4 3. Bc4 Qh4+ 4. Kf1 b5 5. Bxb5 Nf6 6. Nf3 Qh6 7.d3! Nh5 8. Nh4 Qg5 9. Nf5 c6
10. g4 Nf6 11. Rg1 cxb5 12. h4 Qg6 13. h5 Qg5 14. Qf3 Ng8 15. Bxf4 Qf6 16. Nc3 Bc5?? 17. Nd5? Qxb2
18. Bd6? Bxg1?? 19. e5! Qxa1+ 20. Ke2, Na6 21. Nxg7+ Kd8 22. Qxf6+ Nxf6 23. Be7! ++[/pgn]
18. Bd6? again playing to the crowd, Anderssen misses a very easy way to end the game 18. Nc7+!, Kd8; 19.Re1, Bb7; 20.Nxa8, Bxa8; 21.Bxb8 Bxg1; 22.Nxh6, gxh6; 22. Qf7, Qc3 and Black is lost. 18...Bxg1?? fortune favors the brave! Indeed, Kieseritsky is blind to the move which he could play to WIN and this is 18...Qxa1+!!with the moves 19. Ke2, Qb2 and it is Black , not White that wins! In the heat of a battle, many players, especially OTB get caught up in the excitement and fire of the game and it is not uncommon to miss things being so involved in the attacks and multiple decisions to be made at the board, let's be glad these 2 did just that or we would never have a game this beautiful!
19. e5! White is now on the winning path! 19...Qxa1+
20. Ke2, Na6?? Again a horrible blunder that loses the game period. There was more fight in 20...Ba6 and tho White is still winning, it is harder to close the game than the move actually played.
21. Nxg7+, Kd8
[pgn=42]1. e4 e5 2. f4 ef4 3. Bc4 Qh4+ 4. Kf1 b5 5. Bxb5 Nf6 6. Nf3 Qh6 7.d3! Nh5 8. Nh4 Qg5 9. Nf5 c6
10. g4 Nf6 11. Rg1 cxb5 12. h4 Qg6 13. h5 Qg5 14. Qf3 Ng8 15. Bxf4 Qf6 16. Nc3 Bc5?? 17. Nd5? Qxb2
18. Bd6? Bxg1?? 19. e5! Qxa1+ 20. Ke2, Na6 21. Nxg7+ Kd8 22. Qxf6+ Nxf6 23. Be7! ++[/pgn]

22. Now a beautiful move which caps off the sacrifices made my Andsersson, can you see it?? Qxf6+ gorgeous!!..and leading to mate in all variations! 22...Nxf6
23. Can you see the Checkmate?? Be7! ++

A beautiful game, where you can see how hard it can be to calculate all variation in the face of what Looks like an insurmountable attack! Black has chances but he was too worried about Andersson's fierce reputation to calculate properly and by the time the smoke cleared, Andersson kept his head and won a beautiful game; the Brillancy Prize and the "Immortal Game" tag forever!
I hope you enjoyed this game as much as I have enjoyed showing it to you :)

gmiller
Site Admin
Posts: 1388
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 1999 11:13 am
Location: Jeffersonville, IN
Contact:

Re: Game of the Week Posting #3

Post by gmiller » Thu Dec 01, 2011 10:28 am

I added some diagrams in.
Greg Miller

ecperreault
General Forum Grandmaster
Posts: 1139
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:41 pm

Re: Game of the Week Posting #3

Post by ecperreault » Thu Dec 01, 2011 2:37 pm

This game is very well-worn and is used as a basic example of why not to move your Queen too early or too many times in the opening. And tha good players fall into that trap also.
Had Kieseritsky played 18... Qxa1+ it would have really been an 'Immortal Game' also with AA getting shot down in 20 moves (or less depending when he wished to Resign).!

iamachessstudent
Posts: 380
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:35 pm

Re: Game of the Week Posting #3

Post by iamachessstudent » Fri Dec 02, 2011 7:35 am

If Any1 has a nice MINIATURE (22moves or less) that they would like me to comment on and post, Please e mail me, contact me thru Net-Chess or post it here!
I cant promise I can get to all of them, but since the Famous mini;s are so popular, why not our own set of miniatures!?:

HI hope to get some ideas from you all soon AND don't forget tell me about your regular games as well so I can get busy!
Thanks anf I hope every1 has the best of weekends!!

Joshua

islanderfan
Posts: 880
Joined: Mon May 14, 2001 10:56 pm

Re: Game of the Week Posting #3

Post by islanderfan » Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:05 pm

ummmm I am the greatest GM ever known. I have beaten the likes of Davidswhite Angelofthenight, Cliff, some Army brat Eugene and even Josh. Where are my games...... gulp sorry that was my Jekyll talking lol!!!!!!!!!!

ecperreault
General Forum Grandmaster
Posts: 1139
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:41 pm

Re: Game of the Week Posting #3

Post by ecperreault » Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:46 pm

Islanderfan has a full database of Miniatures, 4, 5, even 6 movers he has played over the years. I heard rumors of a 2-mover he played back in'99. :D

jvanmechelen
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:25 am

Re: Game of the Week Posting #3

Post by jvanmechelen » Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:10 am

Guys like Anderssen were real geniuses, underestimated by the Kasparovs of our time. They had to invent everything from scratch. Fischer really valued these 19th-century players. I once read that one of his favorite books was Von Gottschall's book on Anderssen's best games. He kept on analysing these beautiful creations over and over again. Anyway, thanks Josh!

iamachessstudent
Posts: 380
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:35 pm

Re: Game of the Week Posting #3

Post by iamachessstudent » Sat Dec 03, 2011 8:40 am

Thanks Jan!!
You are right, Fischer really appreciated the 19th century players and studied them quite a bit...to Kasparov's Credit in his Great Predecessors Vol I; he does speak rather nicely about Morphy, Andersson, Tchigorin and Steinitz...Its almost impossible not to credit them with the evolution of Chess as it is played today!
KAsparov himself in the 90s brought back the Evan's Gambit and crushed Anand in under 25 moves!
there is allot to be learned form those old masters...my library contains quite a few of their game collections and tournament books from that time period!
Thanks again and good Chess!! :)

Joshua

Post Reply